It's pathetic that this is the only major U.S. news outlet that will touch this story. But I'll take exposure where I can get it
Monica, I just watched the Fox interview and loved all that you said. I join the interviewers in being grateful that you are using your powerful voice in this way. Simon, as for calling RFK Jr an anti-Semite, I urge you to read the following excerpt from Dr. Joe Mercola’s article published today:
Kennedy cited a July 2020 study in BMC Medicine, which reported that, based on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 polymorphism analysis, certain races, as well as people with certain diseases, are more susceptible to COVID-19. As noted in that paper:
“We found unique genetic susceptibility across different populations in ACE2 and TMPRSS2. Specifically, ACE2 polymorphisms were found to be associated with cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions by altering the angiotensinogen-ACE2 interactions, such as p.Arg514Gly in the African/African-American population.
Unique but prevalent polymorphisms ... in TMPRSS2, offer potential explanations for differential genetic susceptibility to COVID-19 as well as for risk factors, including those with cancer and the high-risk group of male patients.”
In his Instagram rebuttal, Kennedy explained that, according to this study, ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews were the least susceptible to COVID-19, while people of African descent and Caucasians were the most susceptible.
“This is not a controversial study,” Kennedy said. “Nobody has suggested that these were deliberately engineered changes. And I certainly don’t believe that they were deliberately engineered.
But what they are is kind of a proof of concept, that you CAN develop bioweapons that will attack certain ethnicities, and this should be terrifying to all of us ... and [needs to be] an object of discussion.”
Here is a link to the video (found via DuckDuckGo search engine): https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6331778452112
Thank You so much for your courage. My son is a trans man and we both agree that the denial of biological sex - and the resultant homophobia and misogyny - is totally incongruent with trans rights and basic human decency.
You are a hero!
Yes! Exactly! (Both to not being able to take anything with us—although my personal belief is that our consciousness lives on after death and that we can thus take any learning with us, just nothing material—and the thickness of the irony of trying to censor a censorship hearing.)
Pathetic is the perfect word for this stance against the trans community. There would be no LGBTQA+ without the T part of that equation.
Hi Monica, I was censored too, for sharing the stories of black detrans lesbians on Instagram and Facebook-they deleted everything in less than 24 hours, after 8 years of content curation and audience building. That is actually why I joined Substack. I've felt really pushed out of social media since then and I am trying to rebuld.
I will say that I have learned a lot about the trans movement in the past few years, and I don't actually believe that transwomen are a marginalized group. They're sort of a mixed bag, some of them gay males who have experienced homophobia...but a lot of them are also straight men who fetishize the female experience (autogynephiles). Either way, they are still men and have the power and privilege that comes with it, whether they take estrogen or not. Transwomen are painted as these delicate feminine creatures but plenty of them can go toe-to-toe with any other man.
I don't really have the space or feel called to advocate for them when they're stomping on our rights all the time, calling us terfs for speaking up for ourselves, and getting us deplatformed, threatening our livelihood. There is so much money and media backing said 'transwomen' rights at the moment...I do not see them as being vulnerable, and certainly not more than women. There are no rights that they don't already have--however, women are losing all of ours so they can have more privileges.
Hi. I have responded to Monica before. My current view is that there is a
"mass formation." This is a technical term best explained by others, but something like mass ideology or masses of people losing the ability even to think or I should say "creatively." And those persons do not know what "creatively" means. Bill Gates is not creative, for example. Nor does he understand the word. He has no soul. What is a soul? Must be some kind of primitive religious thing. So, I think "mass formation" means there is no longer a single person that you can (may) access to show you a different way of seeing life. No "channel" to tune into, like late-night AM radio, or the eleven PM talk shows on TV. So you fall into line, like all the other magnetic filings. In a "mass formation" there is no disagreement anymore. In Chicago, we used to have a guy on TV late night (Kupcinet) who would have every kind of person imaginable on the show, just to give people the opportunity to hear diverse views.
I just heard about the "Stacie-Marie Laughton" case and a new idea comes to mind.
Aren't trans activists infiltrated by pedophiles in disguise on a broader scale than we could think?
Back in the day, pedophilia was tolerated amongst the LGBT community, at least until 1993 (NAMBLA). They were banned since, but some may seek revenge and become willingly "useful idiots" to the service of other agendas...
"Defending women’s rights has now become a “conservative” talking point."
You're right, Monica!
This is on purpose. The idea that the weak spots of the left are today more than ever exploited by the far right spin-doctors is now obvious. This subtle game involves trans-activism today, but could very well involve any activism that once has been labeled "leftist". A long time ago the spin doctors were focused on labeling left as "wrong" and right as "right". Over thirty years they learned to manipulate the "leftists" to become useful idiots. And that worked. Sadly. Now the option is on international matters, there is still huge, deadly flaws in the "right", and we are closer than never to WWIII, and I believe we can make freedom proficient again. We need an online "shadow cabinet" to be created along with every living human who validated a Ph.D. thesis, wherever they live wherever them from. From this "Regency" we can constitute a powerful, sensical lobby, and defend freedom as a whole rather than locally or nationally. I hope this petition below helps understand how "Regencies" and shadow cabinets are the way: https://www.change.org/ContinentalRegency
Thanks again, Monica, and never stop trying!
Monica! Congrats! This is huge! Congrats again!
Oh God, you think Robert Kennedy is a working class hero?
I am pleased that you got your message out on Fox News and hope you have some normal outlets soon. I was less happy to see how happy you were to be at a conference with Putin-loving Tulsi Gabbard and anti-Semite Robert Kennedy. Just because someone has been censored doesn’t make them good company.
That goes precisely to the point I am making. The interests of “T” are no longer aligned with those of “L.” The equation has become problematic because it’s not respectful of the individual needs of each member of this group, but instead conflates them. This isn’t fair, and it certainly isn’t equitable.
Anybody got a link to the interview? Searches on google and FOXBusiness are polluted with similar names.